01A140 – Nooksack R. abv the Middle Fork Water Year 2004 Review Chuck Springer The telemetered streamgaging station on the Nooksack River above the Middle Fork operated throughout water year 2004. A series of very large storm events in October and November caused extensive flooding throughout the Nooksack basin. At this stations these events washed the staff gage away and changed the channel geometry at the site, necessitating mid-water year shifts in the rating curve. Snowmelt began early (early March), and peaked in late-June, with the onset of summer low flows in mid-July. Several small storm events from late-August through mid-September 2004 resulted in minimum flows that were 120 cfs higher than the minimum flows for water year 2003. Data Record and Quality Assurance: The station logged continuously throughout the water year with the exception of a one- day period in June. The cause for this interruption is unknown, but data from an upstream USGS station (1125000 – N.F. Nooksack R. below Cascade Creek) was used to fill the gap. Due to the washout of the staff gage at this site in October, tape down readings from a reference point on the Mosquito Lake Road bridge were used to approximate staff gage values from October through July. During this time, logger readings fluctuated wildly, compounded by the inherent error in the tape down readings. Corrective adjustments were necessary for every weekly visit to the station. The differences between the instrument readings and the manual tape down readings differed by amounts sufficient to result in a difference in predicted flow ranging from -13.2% to +42.5%. A wire weight gage was then installed on the Mosquito Lake Road bridge in August, and the logger was recalibrated. Corrective adjustments were made to the data set, and are documented in the Hydstra Data Workbench. No noise filtering was conducted on data for this station. Rating Curve: The rating curve for the station covers a range of stage from 4.7 ft. to 12.9 ft. The range of stage encountered during the water year ranged from 5.1 ft. to 12.8 ft. The measured range of flows for the station covers only 20% of the range of flows encountered at the site, with measurements ranging from 917 cfs to 5,260 cfs. However, flows exceeded the rating curve less than 5% of the time during the water year. Flows greater than 5,260 cfs were modeled using the established relationship between stage and velocity during the highest measured flows, along with a surveyed high flow cross-section. The accuracy of flows derived from this model is estimated to be within 25%. cws